<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Hartog &#187; optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/tag/optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelhartog.com</link>
	<description>Detailing random personal things since 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PS3, S/PDIF output to computer</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2010/05/ps3-spdif-output-to-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2010/05/ps3-spdif-output-to-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 05:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hartog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently posted this on a forum but I figured this might be a good place as well: Goal: 5.1 output from my PS3 through my computer. Why? I don&#8217;t have any other way to output to 5.1 from it without spending money (receiver + different speakers). What I have: First gen PS3, HDMI and TOSLINK [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently posted this on a forum but I figured this might be a good place as well:</p>
<blockquote><p>Goal:<br />
5.1 output from my PS3 through my computer.<br />
Why? I don&#8217;t have any other way to output to 5.1 from it without spending money (receiver + different speakers).</p>
<p>What I have:<br />
First gen PS3, HDMI and TOSLINK cables.</p>
<p>Monitor has HDMI -&gt; analog stereo output<br />
Problems: Constant low hum (monitor has bad quality output) and only 2.0 sound. This requires the monitor to be on HDMI output to passthrough audio as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Motherboard/Products_Overview.aspx?ProductID=2959">This</a> motherboard. It has a Realtek ALC888 chip. I also have the separate bracket for TOSLINK in.<br />
Problems: This can do stereo but no DTS/Dolby, but it fixes the buzzing problem. It can also play when the monitor is on different output.</p>
<p>And a Creative X-Fi Extreme Audio card.<br />
This has S/PDIF in, but I am not spending $100+ on the options they have to actually use it. Instead I am trying repin the gigabyte bracket and have it connect to this card. It does have DTS/Dolby decoding :D</p>
<p>So, the gigabyte manual says that the bracket has three pins.<br />
1. red &#8211; Power<br />
2. yellow &#8211; SPDIF_I<br />
3. black &#8211; GND</p>
<p>So I switched black and yellow to match up with this <a href="http://kb.kxproject.lugosoft.com/AD_EXT.jpg">pinout diagram of the creative card</a> (top left, +5V, GRN, SPDIF0 IN)</p>
<p>Plugged that in and&#8230; nothing. I can hear feint popping when I switch audio output devices on the PS3, but the Creative card never shows a signal (&#8220;Unknown or invalid signal&#8221;, just like when disconnected).</p>
<p>Any help or insight would be appreciated, thanks.</p></blockquote>
<p>P.S. I think I may have destroyed any input on my sound card by fooling around with this. My microphone no longer works on that sound card :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2010/05/ps3-spdif-output-to-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2010/03/back-to-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2010/03/back-to-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hartog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comparisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was outside the CSClub today, studying hard for that CS246 midterm when a conversation about Firefox&#8217;s stagnation broke out. Many points about it having an incredibly old base and just not being so great compared to Chrome. So I looked back at why I switched away from Chrome the last time I was using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was outside the CSClub today, studying hard for that CS246 midterm when a conversation about Firefox&#8217;s stagnation broke out. Many points about it having an incredibly old base and just not being so great compared to Chrome.</p>
<p>So I looked back at why I switched away from Chrome the last time I was using it.</p>
<ul>
<li>Too much RAM usage on my netbook with Windows 7</li>
<li>No bookmark syncing, Xmarks wasn&#8217;t working  at the time</li>
<li>Missing many add-ons I loved in Firefox</li>
</ul>
<p>And effectively all these problems have been solved. My netbook is now running Ubuntu, Xmarks works and google has their own built in syncing with google docs and there are many more add-ons (like ad-blocker) so I&#8217;m not missing any functionality. Not to mention that Chrome feels like a faster browser and uses less vertical space by default.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m back with Chrome. I might look like a google fanboy but I think of it as the same as I think of Logitech. I didn&#8217;t decide to buy a Logitech mouse (or three), keyboard, speakers and headset because I&#8217;m in love with the company. I chose it because those were the best products at the time. Google makes some really nice products, so I will embrace them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2010/03/back-to-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patch Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2009/09/patch-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2009/09/patch-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hartog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just wanted to mention something that a lot of people don&#8217;t know about, Patch Tuesday. That would be that scheduled Microsoft patched are sent out the second Tuesday of every month. The only exception is that critical patches become available as soon as possible. Why does this matter? Well if you don&#8217;t want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to mention something that a lot of people don&#8217;t know about, <a title="Patch Tuesday" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch_Tuesday">Patch Tuesday</a>. That would be that scheduled Microsoft patched are sent out the second Tuesday of every month. The only exception is that critical patches become available as soon as possible.</p>
<p>Why does this matter? Well if you don&#8217;t want to run automatic updates you can make a note of the second Tuesday of every and just run Windows Update then instead of always having a background process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2009/09/patch-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Restroom/Bathroom/Washroom</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2009/08/restroom-bathroom-washroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2009/08/restroom-bathroom-washroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hartog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comparisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apocryblog.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three lovely words to describe where humans do their dirty business, and none of them actually describe what is actually done. Restroom: If anyone things their resting while in there, I have to wonder what I&#8217;ve been doing wrong. I think this word is much more appropriate for a bedroom where you can get some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three lovely words to describe where humans do their dirty business, and none of them actually describe what is actually done.</p>
<p>Restroom: If anyone things their resting while in there, I have to wonder what I&#8217;ve been doing wrong. I think this word is much more appropriate for a bedroom where you can get some real resting done. This really isn&#8217;t appropriate in language today.</p>
<p>Bathroom: Does it have a bath in it? About 50% chance in a house, no chance in a restaurant. Are you going to use it? Maybe 20-25% of the time in a given day but I usually don&#8217;t need to actually say &#8220;I&#8217;m going to the bathroom to have a bath.&#8221; when it is much simpler to say &#8220;I&#8217;m going to have a bath.&#8221; and location is implied. (Note: I don&#8217;t take baths, but I don&#8217;t want to call it a showerroom either.)</p>
<p>Washroom: Yes, it is part of the process. A very important part I might add. And you can just do a wash by itself. But it does NOT represent the majority of the going ons in the &#8220;washroom&#8221;. But this does seem to be the best choice to describe the room while still avoiding all the actual subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2009/08/restroom-bathroom-washroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insisting on putting cases on everything</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2009/08/insisting-on-putting-cases-on-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2009/08/insisting-on-putting-cases-on-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hartog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comparisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate people who put cases on everything. Cases on ipods, cell phones, DS/PSPs. These devices are specifically designed for a small form factor and yet people will sometimes double the size to throw on some plastic case over their devices. Why do people do this? Protection. So that their gadget still looks good after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate people who put cases on everything. Cases on ipods, cell phones, DS/PSPs. These devices are specifically designed for a small form factor and yet people will sometimes double the size to throw on some plastic case over their devices.</p>
<p>Why do people do this? Protection. So that their gadget still looks good after a few months of use.</p>
<p>But what ends up happening is the case starts to look horrible. It scratches easier than what it is protecting in the first place. I&#8217;ve seen cell phones and ipods with screens you can&#8217;t even see anymore. So you end up with a terrible looking unusable device.</p>
<p>The only thing worse than this is leaving the plastic covers on that devices are shipped. This is most evident on HP Laptops. These are generally dirtier than the device because they&#8217;ve been through the factory. They have bubbles under them. They sometimes are half off and people still try to keep it on&#8230; Next time I see one of those I&#8217;m ripping it off.</p>
<p>Update Dec 2009: There are many new computers at work with that plastic film that I have been able to take off. It feels great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2009/08/insisting-on-putting-cases-on-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bookmarklets</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2008/07/bookmarklets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2008/07/bookmarklets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hartog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apocryblog.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bookmarklets are little peices of javascript disguised as bookmarks that you can run on any site. They let you do things like Resize forms. You can test it out by dragging it into your bookmarks toolbar and trying it out on the comments section. Other good bookmarklets I&#8217;ve come across are: BugMeNot for getting past [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bookmarklets are little peices of javascript disguised as bookmarks that you can run on any site. They let you do things like <a href="javascript:TxtRsz={formEl:null,adEv:function(t,ev,fn){if(typeof%20document.addEventListener!='undefined'){t.addEventListener(ev,fn,false)}else{t.attachEvent('on'+ev,fn)}},rmEv:function(t,ev,fn){if(typeof%20document.removeEventListener!='undefined'){t.removeEventListener(ev,fn,false)}else{t.detachEvent('on'+ev,fn)}},init:function(){var%20textareas=document.getElementsByTagName('textarea');for(var%20i=0;i%3Ctextareas.length;i++){textareas[i].style.cursor='se-resize'}var%20inputs=document.getElementsByTagName('input');for(var%20i=0;i%3Cinputs.length;i++){if(inputs[i].type=='text'){inputs[i].style.cursor='e-resize'}}TxtRsz.adEv(document,'mousedown',TxtRsz.initResize)},initResize:function(event){if(typeof%20event=='undefined'){event=window.event}var%20target=event.target||event.srcElement;if(target.nodeName.toLowerCase()=='textarea'||(target.nodeName.toLowerCase()=='input'&amp;&amp;target.type=='text')){TxtRsz.formEl=target;TxtRsz.formEl.startWidth=TxtRsz.formEl.clientWidth;TxtRsz.formEl.startHeight=TxtRsz.formEl.clientHeight;TxtRsz.formEl.startX=event.clientX;TxtRsz.formEl.startY=event.clientY;TxtRsz.adEv(document,'mousemove',TxtRsz.resize);TxtRsz.adEv(document,'mouseup',TxtRsz.stopResize);try{event.preventDefault()}catch(e){}}},resize:function(event){if(typeof%20event=='undefined'){event=window.event}try{TxtRsz.formEl.style.width=event.clientX-TxtRsz.formEl.startX+TxtRsz.formEl.startWidth+'px'}catch(e){}if(TxtRsz.formEl.nodeName.toLowerCase()=='textarea'){TxtRsz.formEl.style.height=event.clientY-TxtRsz.formEl.startY+TxtRsz.formEl.startHeight+'px'}},stopResize:function(event){TxtRsz.rmEv(document,'mousedown',TxtRsz.initResize);TxtRsz.rmEv(document,'mousemove',TxtRsz.resize);var%20textareas=document.getElementsByTagName('textarea');for(var%20i=0;i%3Ctextareas.length;i++){textareas[i].style.cursor='text'}var%20inputs=document.getElementsByTagName('input');for(var%20i=0;i%3Cinputs.length;i++){if(inputs[i].type=='text'){inputs[i].style.cursor='text'}}}};TxtRsz.init();">Resize forms</a>. You can test it out by dragging it into your bookmarks toolbar and trying it out on the comments section.</p>
<p>Other good bookmarklets I&#8217;ve come across are:</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="javascript:(function(){w=open(('http://www.bugmenot.com/view/'+escape(location)),'w','location=no,status=yes,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=500,height=400,modal=yes,dependent=yes');if(w){setTimeout('w.focus()',1000)}else{location='http://www.bugmenot.com/view/'+escape(location)}})();">BugMeNot</a> for getting past registration quickly on large sites.</li>
<li><a href="javascript:void(location.href='http://is.gd/create.php?longurl='+location.href)">is.gd</a> for making urls smaller, similar to tinyurl except an even smaller url.</li>
<li>You can also download videos from youtube and other places with <a title="Download Youtube" href="http://1024k.de/bookmarklets/video-bookmarklets.html" target="_blank">this link</a> (not a bookmarklet)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelhartog.com/blog/2008/07/bookmarklets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

